One of the more earth shattering things I learned about composition this
semester was the idea of the mode being the message. My schooling has had a staunch devotion to
the almighty essay. While now I am
thrilled to be able to write a decent essay, they were for many years the bane
of my existence. I was never a strong
writer, and I am still a wretched speller.
Essays were extremely difficult for me.
For most of my school career I assumed that because I could not write an
essay, then I must not understand the information. Now I realize that essays did not jive with
my personal learning strategy. One of my
missions as an educator is to provide learning opportunities that appeal to a
wide variety of learners. Of course, I will continue to teach the basics that
men in suits expect from their employees, but fortunately that idea is quickly
broadening due to an explosion of multi-modal communication.
I admit, I may have overdone the notion of self-expression in my syllabus,
but that is because I was so taken with the idea of allowing students to make
choices about how they present information and reflecting on the success of
that choice. This is a really exciting
time to study communication because it has never been so varied. With the proliferation of technology, classes
will have to include different ways for students to present information, and,
by extension, will appeal to a larger range of learners. Students will not only have to make choices
about what they present, but how they present it; what is the right choice for
the right audience and topic. This
notion pairs so well with composition is like the entire field has been waiting
for this shift. It is clear to me from
grading that there are students who still struggle with the idea of making
choices in writing. It a fair thing to struggle
with; it is abstract and they have had very little experience intentionally practicing
it. However, the idea of choices will be
easier to demonstrate if you ask them whether or not this information should be
presented in a video or podcast. Without
realizing it, they will be discussing rhetoric, and it will be easier for them
to recognize similar choices in pieces of writing.
When composition shifts to focus as much on the medium as much as the
content, there will be a number of struggles. Adding new complications will be
difficult for some, others may not appreciate the differences in the mediums,
and a hundred more issues that no one can prepare for. However, this is a massive shift in
composition, and when the topic expands to more than just writing, it can
appeal to and interest a number of different learners. After all, learning is about making choices,
considering the results, and adjusting your actions. As with every lesson, the process becomes
more complicated. However, the advances we talk towards expansion and inclusion
can only lead to an overwhelming number of good things.
Jill, I, too, get carried away with the concept of self-expression when considering my teaching philosophy, as I think that self-expression is at the heart of our profession! It is so easy to feel overtaken with passion about a piece of literature, to go all "Dead Poets Society" and want to tell your students to stand on their desks to gain new perspective--anything to get them excited about reading (and I don't think this is a bad thing). That being said, you're absolutely right; we should be allowing students to come to the subject in the way that they most feel comfortable.
ReplyDelete